England's Ashes casualty list

The Test team’s bowling resources have taken a severe hit over the last six months

George Dobell09-Nov-2017Jake Ball
Suffered a sprained ankle on the second day in Adelaide. The extent of the injury remains unclear. Ball missed the start of England’s Test series with South Africa during the summer with a knee injury.Steven Finn
Returned home on Wednesday having sustained a knee injury in the nets that may require surgery. Finn was only called up for Australia after Ben Stokes was made unavailable.Moeen Ali
Sustained a side strain in Perth and has yet to bowl on tour. He is expected to play in Townsville next week.Ben Stokes
Currently unavailable as the police investigation into his part in a fracas outside a Bristol nightclub in September continues. Stokes’ absence has been particularly problematic for England, as he would usually bat at No. 6 and form part of a four-man pace attack.Toby Roland-Jones
Roland-Jones was certain to win selection in the main squad after impressing against South Africa and West Indies but was ruled out after being diagnosed with a stress fracture in his lower back at the end of his breakthrough season.Mark Wood suffered a heel injury during the summer•Getty ImagesMark Wood
Still not deemed sufficiently fit having sustained a bruised heel during the Test series against South Africa in July. He did play a couple of Championship matches at the end of the season in an attempt to prove his fitness – and is also part of the Lions squad – but was not considered fit for selection as a replacement for Finn earlier this week.Jamie Porter
The top wicket-taker in Division One of the Championship this year, Essex’s 24-year-old attack leader was forced to pull out of the Lions tour after a stress fracture was diagnosed in his lower back.Jamie Overton
The quicker of the Overton twins, Jamie suffered a stress fracture in his back after an impressive start to the season. He has been named on the ECB’s Pace Programme and hopes to bowl at the England squad in the nets over Christmas.

Sublime Kohli knocks out Australia

ESPNcricinfo staff27-Mar-2016Aaron Finch’s bat also left the bowlers in the dust, as the score raced to 54 for 0 in four overs•Associated PressIndia fans, who had very little to cheer about till then, found their voice when Ashish Nehra had Khawaja caught behind for 26•Associated PressThen David Warner was done in by R Ashwin for 6 off 9 balls•AFPThe spinners’ waltz: Yuvraj Singh picked up a wicket with his first ball of the tournament, and it was the big one of Steven Smith•AFPSmith, though, was quite unhappy with the umpire ruling him out caught behind and Australia were 74 for 3 in the 10th over•Getty ImagesGlenn Maxwell played a responsible innings – even if it included a wild switch hit for six. He had 31 off 28 balls when he missed a Jasprit Bumrah slower ball in the 17th over•AFPShane Watson was put under the spotlight, but he did quite fine in his new role of finisher•Getty ImagesHardik Pandya was given the final over again, but this time he conceded two fours and a six•Getty ImagesWatson and Peter Nevill took Australia from 130 for 5 in 16.3 overs to 160 by the time the 20th was done•Getty ImagesShikhar Dhawan gave India a steady start in the chase…•AFP… before falling to Nathan Coulter-Nile•AFPWatson accounted for Dhawan’s opening partner, Rohit Sharma, two overs later•Associated PressWatson struck once again to remove Suresh Raina in his next over as India were reduced to 49 for 3•AFPVirat Kohli and Yuvraj Singh then went about rebuilding India’s innings with a 45-run partnership•Associated PressYuvraj, though, picked up an ankle injury during his stay at the crease…•Getty Images… before a Watson stunner ended his innings for 21•Associated PressIndia’s asking rate kept soaring in the slog overs, but Kohli kept his cool as he was joined by MS Dhoni•AFPWith 39 required off the last three overs, Kohli unleashed a lethal attack on James Faulkner, taking the left-arm pacer for 19 runs in the 18th over•Associated PressIn the next over, he took Coulter-Nile for 16 runs, and India needed just four off the last over•Getty ImagesAs he has done on many occasions, Dhoni hit the winning runs for India•AFPKohli eventually ended on 82 not out off 51 balls, taking India into the semi-final against West Indies in Mumbai, while Australia were knocked out•Associated PressAt the end of the match, the Australia side clapped off Watson as he stepped off the field for the last time in Australia colours•Getty ImagesWhile Kohli, on the other hand, received a hero’s welcome in the India camp•IDI/Getty Images

South Africa feel de Villiers' negative vibe

AB de Villiers felt a lack of “electric vibe” before South Africa’s match against Pakistan – and his post-match disgust revealed that things only got worse

Firdose Moonda07-Mar-20152:18

AB de Villiers had nothing positive to say about South Africa’s defeat

Meet South Africa. The only team to have posted 400 runs twice in succession in an ODI. The team with two batsmen, Hashim Amla and AB de Villiers, who consider each other the best in the world and who the rest of the world consider the best, too. The team with the top-ranked pace bowler in the global game. The team de Villiers has “nothing good to say about at the moment.”After being defeated in what de Villiers identified as the second of the big matches in the pool stage – the first was against India – the South African captain has concluded that his men may “not be as good as we think we are,” and were “not prepared to fight it out,” against a spirited Pakistan.”I hate losing. I’ve got nothing good to say about the team at the moment,” de Villiers said. “Hopefully we have got four games left in the tournament and opportunity to lift the trophy. We need to approach the quarter-finals with a fresh mindset. I’ve got nothing good to say about performance today.”The truth was something was not right from the moment South Africa arrived at Eden Park and de Villiers knew it. “I didn’t feel an electric vibe,” he said.It did not seem as though many people, particularly South African supporters, felt that vibe. On the quiet suburbs around Eden Park, which is just three kilometres from the city where almost a third of the population of New Zealand lives, the currents flow calmly.Activity was limited to a square outside Gate A where one group was rollerblading, another was on stilts and a third mimicked the person directing foot traffic. Forty minutes before the match was due to begin the stands of Eden Park were similarly sparse as spectators waited to see if the weather would hold before committing their Saturday to sport.When they came in, the green of Pakistan outnumbered the green and gold of South Africa. They did not intimidate in the same way the Indian-dominated crowd at MCG did but their presence added to what already been a morning of mishaps for South Africa.Vernon Philander had been declared fit and available on Friday, after missing the previous two matches with a hamstring strain, but he had to withdraw from the playing XI before play when he experienced discomfort again. De Villiers admitted he felt he was “thrown a curve ball before the game”. The extent of that curve was only known later when the effect Philander’s absence had on the batting line-up was exposed.South Africa needed him more with the bat than the ball which encapsulates the actual issue of their team: the make-up of their team, not the mindset. They are without a regular genuine all-rounder and are constantly compromising on an element of their game. Their gambles have often paid off before and they almost paid off again when they limited Pakistan to a chaseable total, albeit it with a makeshift fifth bowler.Wahab Riaz signals victory in a match where only Pakistan felt the vibe•Getty ImagesThis time duties were shared between JP Duminy and de Villiers himself, who offers little more than novelty value as a bowler. His medium pace is innocuous and, even though de Villiers snagged the wicket of Younis Khan between him and Duminy, they cost the team 77 runs.De Villiers made exactly that score with bat in hand but lacked support, which illustrates South Africa’s more pressing concern. They are prone to collapses when the middle order is exposed to pressure.The only way to avoid that is with consistently solid starts at the top and a line-up that bats deep. Against Pakistan, they had neither. Philander, or even Wayne Parnell offer more with the bat than Abbott and South Africa may need to look at including one of them instead of a specialist seamer.They will be more worried about what to do with Quinton de Kock, whose lean run has now stretched one game too many. Although his talent is not in question, de Kock has now gone five innings with only one score in double figures.At another stage of his career, that would be regarded as a rough patch that could be smoothed over with sufficient game time, especially as he returning from a serious injury. But this is a World Cup and luxuries like that are hard to afford, unless, as is the case with de Kock, the player is needed in another capacity.De Kock is also the first-choice gloveman, who frees de Villiers up to lead, prowl the outfield and bowl. Leaving him out would require de Villiers to take the gloves but allow South Africa to play another batsman – in-form Rilee Rossouw would be the obvious choice. But then too much would be asked of the captain.Already, South Africa depend on him with the bat, although they have taken great care to play that down lest it be perceived as over-reliance. When Russell Domingo was asked about de Villiers recently, he said, ‘He is a wonderful player but we have many wonderful players,” while another member of the support staff repeatedly reminded that South Africa are not a “one-player team.”De Villiers himself brushed off suggestions he is overburdened, even after the Pakistan performance. “I know I can’t win this World Cup on my own: I need my team-mates,” he said. “They’ve got the ability and capability and the talent to do that. It’s about the senior guys stepping up and helping some of the youngsters to lift their game. We can all play cricket.”Now, they have to show they can play cricket even when they are not feeling as charged up as usual. “It’s my responsibility to try and get them going which I couldn’t do today. I could feel nothing was happening at 100%.”It’s like a car that in second or third gear and that won’t win you games. Not under pressure in big tournaments like this.”
Unless South Africa change that, de Villiers won’t be the only one with nothing good to say.

Still reasons for Clarke to smile

Australia were always going to lose this Ashes. A victory in this Test wouldn’t change that. But just by winning this Test they could have proved something to themselves

Jarrod Kimber at Old Trafford05-Aug-2013Michael Clarke is a man with a smile. Whether it’s standing beside his wife on her wedding horse, in his tight underwear on a billboard or as he makes an iconic innings at his home ground, he lights up a picture. In real life, he seems to smile even more. He very rarely looks angry, or upset. He’s composed, calm and happy.None of those descriptions could be used as he barked and pleaded with Marais Erasmus to stay on the ground at the end of the fourth day at Old Trafford. Clarke had carried his team on day one and two. His bowlers had backed him up on day three. On day four they had put themselves in a position to win the Test. Clarke knew it as much as England did. All they needed was time. But when time was taken from Clarke, he exploded.Clarke knew coming off the field that he couldn’t regain the Ashes, and that Cricket Australia’s #returntheurn hashtag would have discarded. It was a culmination of poor preparation, random cricket logic and a team that wasn’t as good as the opposition. Australia were always going to lose this Ashes. A victory in this Test wouldn’t change that. It would have prolonged it.But just by winning this Test they could have proved something to themselves. That they could win a Test against England. That the incompetence of Lord’s and the streakiness of Trent Bridge were only part of their story. That they could compete and beat England when it mattered. And they did everything they could to do it.Chris Rogers’ first innings was the sort of knock that not even Rogers would have expected to play at Test level. It surprised England as well, while setting the scene for Australia. He drove the ball like an eager teenager, not a crusty old opener. He scored freely against a quality attack. He handled Graeme Swann well. As a 34-year-old you only get so many chances, and he may not have cemented his spot, but he will get at least all five of this Ashes based on an innings of that quality.The second innings situation was perfect for David Warner. No matter where he batted in the order, the need to score quickly and not have all the fielders up couldn’t have been more perfect for him. His 41 was not a massive total, or one that will rock your world, but he did his job, looked comfortable doing so and looked like the David Warner Australia want him to be. With the press, Barmy Army and Aussie Fanatics he played with his new pantomime villain status. To use the lexicon, he is definitely a positive to be taken.Steven Smith is a rough batsman. On skill and technique he is not in Australia’s best six. On fight and confidence, he might be. He is a perfect flawed batsman for a flawed team. He scores quickly, believes in himself, and when he plays spin it’s hard to believe he is really Australian. His wickets at Lord’s were handy and his fielding is going to live with us forever on Youtube highlight reels. If this team was better, they wouldn’t need him. He should have got a hundred in the first innings at Old Trafford. And a proper Test batsman would have converted it. Or at least got out in a nicer way. But as a No. 6, or even a seven, he is the sort of junkyard dog cricketer a team like the current Australia can really use.

Ryan Harris’ spell this morning proved yet again that he is one of the best Test bowlers on the planet. He’s quick enough to hurry anyone. He’s smart enough to out-think quality players

It some ways, Brad Haddin is not needed by Australia. His selection in this team was more about team bonding and attitude. Something that Warner’s punch and Arthur’s sacking fixed much quicker. His first innings hitting was exactly what Australia needed. Haddin saves his best cricket for the Ashes, and in two innings he has shown good form and timely runs. His wicketkeeping is not going to get any better – keepers’ hands and knees don’t get better – and Mitchell Starc is not an easy man to keep too. Or on some occasions, even reach. But he’s in form, and clearly is desperate to stay in this team. If nothing else, he’ll force Matthew Wade to improve.Ryan Harris’ spell this morning proved yet again that he is one of the best Test bowlers on the planet. He’s quick enough to hurry anyone. He’s smart enough to out-think quality players. And he does enough with the ball beat anyone. At his best he’s a carnivorous force that will stalk you until you are head. At his worst, he is injured. There is little Australia can do about that. When he is fit, he should be given the new ball and the best medical treatment they can afford.Merv Hughes was a decent Test-quality bowler who helped keep the flame alive between Lillee and McGrath. Hughes’ job was mostly to try hard, bowl the dog spells, bounce out batsmen on flat tracks and use the conditions when they suited him.Peter Siddle also averages 28 and takes four wickets a match. In almost every Test he is used in a different way. He’s bowled with the new ball, come on third change, and will bowl into the wind or with it. But no matter what you do with Siddle, he tries very hard, hits the pitch very hard and makes you beat him. It’s hard to hate a man who went to Euro Disney between series and gave up bacon and steak to be a better player.Starc is capable of amazing feats with the ball, and even the bat. Playing him is a chance that Australia sometimes likes to take. Shane Watson’s comeback at the top of the order might already be over. He also only has one wicket. But his bowling has been very handy, and he deserves more. No cricketer in this series has the ability to improve more than Watson. Usman Khawaja doesn’t look a Test No. 3 right now, but it’s hard to believe a man who bats with that much time can’t make runs at this level.Nathan Lyon is not Graeme Swann. One is a fridge that cools things, and the other an American style fridge freezer that will give you water and ice on demand. Everyone wants the bigger fridge, but life doesn’t work that way. Lyon bowls good dipping offspin outside off stump spun well toward the stumps. But Swann’s straight ball is far more devious. Swann gets more spin. Swann is smarter. Swann is a top fielder and a handy slogger. In some ways, the difference between the two teams is summed up in the spinners. Lyon tries hard; Swann has 19 wickets in this series.Every player in this team has something holding them back including age, consistency, injury and skill. Clarke is their best cricketer. But his back is a problem. When he fiddles with his back, takes a pain pill, or does a stretch, there is little smiling. And while he might have lost the anger he had when screaming at Erasmus, that won’t be replaced with smiles knowing they have already lost their chance to retain the Ashes.This team is not perfect, and it’s not going to be for a while. But they came into this Test as gruesome victims on a hotel bathroom floor, and they outplayed a better opposition for the entire Test. It’s not a win, but it is something to smile about.

Spin is king

On a day filled with drama, 16 wickets fell for 161 as Pakistan’s spinners conjured up an incredible triumph. Stats highlights from the Test

S Rajesh28-Jan-2012

  • This is only the fifth time that England have lost chasing a fourth-innings target of less than 150. It’s only their second such defeat in the last 110 years – their last loss was in 1978 against New Zealand in Wellington, when they were bundled out for 64 chasing 137. The margin of defeat was exactly the same in both Tests – 72 runs.
  • Pakistan have defended a target of less than 150 for only the second time in Test cricket. Their only previous such instance was in Hamilton in 1993, when New Zealand, needing 127 for victory, were bowled out for 93. On that occasion Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis took five wickets each; here, all ten wickets fell to spin. In all, only 18 times has a team failed to chase a target of less than 150. Australia have been at the receiving end seven times in these low chases.
  • England’s total of 72 is their lowest against Pakistan; their previous lowest was 130. It also equals the lowest in Tests between these two teams: Pakistan had been dismissed for exactly the same score at Edgbaston in 2010.
  • Exactly 125 years ago, England had been bundled out for 45 against Australia in Sydney, which remains their lowest score in Test cricket. However, they’d ended up winning that Test by 13 runs. This score is their 12th-lowest in Tests.
  • Pakistan’s spinners returned figures of 19 for 287, which is their third-best match figures. Only twice have their spinners taken all 20 wickets – against England in 1987, when Abdul Qadir, Tauseef Ahmed and Iqbal Qasim were the protagonists, and against West Indies in 1980, when Qadir, Qasim and Mohammad Nazir were the stars. In all, 31 wickets fell to spin in the Test – only five times have spinners taken more wickets in a Test.
  • Abdur Rehman had match figures of 8 for 92, which are his best in a Test. His second-innings haul of 6 for 25 are also his best figures in an innings, and his maiden five-for in Tests.
  • Twenty-nine out of 40 dismissals in this match were bowled or lbw, which is a record in Test cricket. The previous record was also in a Test involving Pakistan, against West Indies in Providence last year, when 26 wickets fell in this manner.
  • Seven batsmen scored less than 2 in England’s second innings, the second-most in Test history.

Bangalore's road to the final

On the eve of the final, Cricinfo takes a look at how Bangalore got there

Kanishkaa Balachandran23-May-2009Bangalore’s turnaround came about when Anil Kumble took over the captaincy•AFPMatch 1 v Rajasthan Royals in Cape Town

Scorecard
The result shocked everybody. Last year’s champions, Rajasthan Royals, were humbled in the most embarrassing manner by Bangalore, who finished second from last the previous year. They scratched out 133 and in reply, Rajasthan crashed to 58. It was a day for the old folks – Shane Warne was at his mesmeric best, Rahul Dravid scored 66 and Anil Kumble returned astonishing figures of 5 for 5, cleaning up the lower order.Match 2 v Chennai Super Kings in Port Elizabeth

Scorecard
Bangalore saw the other side of the coin in the following match, collapsing to 87. Matthew Hayden rolled back the years with a brisk 65 as Chennai Super Kings piled on an imposing 179. Bangalore were out of the contest when they lost five wickets for 26 runs before the 11th over.Match 3 v Deccan Chargers in Cape Town

Scorecard
For the second game in succession, Bangalore were batted out of the contest. Adam Gilchrist and Rohit Sharma slammed half-centuries, scored 123 between them off 75 deliveries, with 88 of them coming in boundary hits. Bangalore lost a wicket without having scored a run for the third time in a row and struggled to keep with the asking rate. Virat Kohli managed a fifty but the rescue effort came too late.Match 4 v Kings XI Punjab in Durban

Kings XI Punjab 173 for 3 (Bopara 84) beat Bangalore Royal Challengers 168 for 9 (Kallis 62, Abdulla 4-31, Pathan 3-35) by seven wickets
Scorecard
The euphoria of their opening win was followed by three successive defeats as Bangalore went down comprehensively to Kings XI Punjab. The match was best remembered for Ravi Bopara’s ice-cool and risk-free 84, helping Punjab overhaul the target with ease. Bangalore were set for a much higher total but lost their way towards the end of the innings.Match 5 v Delhi Daredevils in Port Elizabeth
Delhi Daredevils 150 for 4 (Dilshan 67*) beat Bangalore Royal Challengers 149 for 7 (Pietersen 37, Nehra 2-34) by six wickets
Scorecard
Bangalore had a chance to upset the tournament favourites when their weak bowling attack kept them in the game longer than most people expected. However, their fielding went to pieces towards the end, which allowed Delhi to get away. The image of Pietersen bowled through the gate after attempting a switch-hit symbolised Bangalore’s shambolic state of affairs at this stage.Match 6 v Kolkata Knight Riders in Durban

Scorecard
Down and out, Bangalore turned the corner against an equally insecure team, but they huffed and puffed to victory. Bangalore’s spinners restricted Kolkata Knight Riders to a below-par total and their batsmen put them on track to an easy win before a sudden collapse gave Kolkata hope. Ten were needed off the last over and Bangalore emerged the deserved winners thanks to Mark Boucher’s heroics.Match 7 v Kings XI Punjab in Durban
Royal Challengers Bangalore 145 for 9 (van der Merwe 35, Abdulla 4-36, Yuvraj 3-22) beat Kings XI Punjab 137 for 7 (Yuvraj 50, Praveen 2-27, Kumble 2-25) by eight runs
Scorecard
Yuvraj Singh stole the show with a hat-trick to keep Bangalore to 145 and he seemed to make the match his own when he strolled to a fifty. But at the stroke of the time-out, Bangalore scripted one of the most amazing turnarounds thanks to Kumble and Roelof van der Merwe. Fortunes oscillated towards the end and Bangalore prevailed under pressure when Praveen Kumar bowled an amazing final over to seal the game.Match 8 v Mumbai Indians in Johannesburg
Royal Challengers Bangalore 150 for 1 (Kallis 69*, Uthappa 66*) beat Mumbai Indians 149 for 4 (Jayasuriya 52, Bravo 50*, du Preez 3-32) by nine wickets
Scorecard
The once-whipping boys of the tournament meant business against the strong Mumbai bowling attack, strolling to one of the easiest chases in the tournament. The little-known Dillon du Preez set the tone with a double-wicket maiden and that kept Mumbai under check for most part. Robin Uthappa and Jacques Kallis led the chase with brisk sixties and Bangalore, all of a sudden, were in the top four.Match 9 v Rajasthan Royals in Centurion

Scorecard
Rajasthan had their revenge following a spineless effort by Bangalore’s batsmen. Rajasthan’s bowlers got the measure of the pitch better, keeping the ball short and restricting the opposition to 105. Their counterparts failed to exploit the bounce and overall it was a no-contest simply because there was no cushion of runs to work with.Match 10 v Mumbai Indians in Port Elizabeth

Scorecard
Bangalore cracked again, this time against a team desperate for a win after being pushed into a corner. Chasing 158, the Bangalore top order failed to click and felt the heat at 58 for 4 at the strategy break. The loss of wickets only piled the pressure on Boucher who made an unbeaten 48 with little support from the other end. It wasn’t a great day for Bangalore’s bowlers either, who managed to pick up only two wickets.Match 11 v Kolkata Knight Riders in Centurion
by six wickets
Scorecard
Ross Taylor’s blinder of an unbeaten 81 off 33 balls symbolised Bangalore’s late resurgence, one which made them contenders for the semi-final line-up. They looked out of depth in the chase of 174 but later feasted on some shoddy death bowling. Taylor’s brutal assault overshadowed Kolkata’s admirable batting display and gave Bangalore much-needed self belief following some inconsistent results.The misfit from the previous edition, Jacques Kallis, was a valuable asset with both bat and ball in familiar conditions•Associated PressMatch 12 v Chennai Super Kings in Durban

Scorecard
It was a tale of batting collapses from both sides. Bangalore survived a Hayden-assault to keep Chennai down to 129 and were coasting at 86 for 3 in the 15th over before hell broke loose. The calm Taylor held firm in the nervy moments of the chase and helped Bangalore across the finish line. It was Praveen Kumar’s six in the penultimate over which swing the game in Bangalore’s favour.Match 13 v Delhi Daredevils in Johannesburg

Scorecard
There were no such anxious moments against a strong Delhi outfit. Jacques Kallis played an important role in keeping Delhi to a chaseable score with a restrictive spell, before shepherding the chase with an assured half-century. Praveen did the damage with 3 for 30 and the below-par target of 135 was approached intelligently by the top order.Match 14 v Deccan Chargers in Centurion

Scorecard
Bangalore unearthed a talent in Manish Pandey who became the first Indian to score a century in the IPL. Sent up to open, Pandey single-handedly led Bangalore’s charge with some fierce hits to push his team to 170. It was game on when Herschelle Gibbs waded into the attack but the script turned Bangalore’s way once the spinners came on and make Deccan’s task tougher by plugging at the wickets. The win sealed Bangalore’s semi-final berth.Semi-final v Chennai Super Kings in Johannesburg

Scorecard
Bangalore were one step away from the summit clash and batted with the intent of avenging the embarrassment of the last season. They overcame a strong start from Chennai’s openers to restrict them to 146 before unleashing Pandey again. His stylish strokes demoralised Chennai and Rahul Dravid at the other end was just as imposing. After suffering a minor hiccup, Bangalore made it through and set up the final clash with last year’s no-hopers Deccan Chargers.

Shows, tells and makes you feel

Christian Ryan’s book about Patrick Eagar’s photographs celebrates the experience of watching the game

Paul Edwards10-Dec-2017″The hardest thing of all to see is what is really there,” writes JA Baker in . Yes.In 1975, Patrick Eagar photographed an English cricket season that included the first World Cup and a four-Test Ashes series. Now Christian Ryan has written a book about that summer, those photographs, Eagar’s art, and much else besides. He has helped us see what this great craftsman preserved from an age when taking pictures cost money and photographers knew what they had only when they had developed each roll of film. Baker’s words might have served as an epigraph for this book.There are no scorecards in , no session-by-session accounts, no chapter headings, and only the roughest sense of chronological order. There are many times when Ryan strays far beyond any of cricket’s wide boundaries. There is a photograph of Muhammad Ali knocking out Sonny Liston, another of the Bee Gees, and even a section of Monet’s . The penultimate picture in the book is Joel Meyerowitz’s famous shot of the North Wall of the World Trade Center after 9/11. This is appropriate, and probably intentional, not least because title is taken from Meyerowitz’s words in a 1981 documentary. It is about the only unoriginal line in the book.To a limited extent, might be seen as a companion work to Gideon Haigh’s . In both books there is a deep curiosity about the technical aspects of the photographer’s craft and the skills of cricketers; one difference, of course, is that Ryan has interviewed Eagar on Skype, whereas Haigh had to discover more about George Beldam’s technique by using more conventional historical methods.There is also the distinction that Haigh’s book is a biography of one cricketer, Victor Trumper, and a history of the game’s most famous photograph whereas Ryan and Eagar’s collaboration ranges across many players and a vast range of images. So let us be done with comparisons; there has never been a cricket book like this.One of the best things about is Ryan’s detailed commentary on specific photographs. In late May 1975 the Australians practised at Lord’s. Jeff Thomson faces the camera, hands on hips, while Dennis Lillee stands a little more side-on. Ryan writes this:

“Thomson was standing, so close they were touching, beside Lillee, one’s are the supple fingers of a cellist, dainty nearly, and his partner, though powerfully built, has a footman’s humble air, these two most glamorous cricketers on earth. On an exposed arm, fair hairs are sprinkled. Something of their beginnings comes through, an asbestos house, anxiety nosebleeds, magpies that swooped, too shy to dance, tensed up and leaving pages blank at school exams, sport all weekend, eaten-out soup cans for golf holes, zonal hockey, fishing, soccer in the Protestant Churches League, cricket in the Municipal and Shire competition.”

It is some writer who can change tenses in a sentence, risk the momentary giggle provoked by an image of shy magpies and still carry off a 98-word prose poem about what it was to be a young Australian athlete in the late-1960s. One does not need to agree with all of Ryan’s observations in order to be enriched by them. And maybe it is intentional that there are white spaces at the bottom of most pages of ; they could accommodate a reader’s own queries and observations. It might therefore be useful to have two copies, one to annotate and one for best. This is one of those relatively rare books that seems to welcome argument. “What are we looking at?” wonders Ryan. “What did I take?” asks Eagar.riverrunSome of Eagar’s photographs prompt us to reconsider cricketers we thought we already knew. A particular favourite is the shot of Steve Waugh playing a forward-defensive shot, almost certainly to a ball from John Emburey, in the 1989 Lord’s Test. Jack Russell has the gloves and Dickie Bird is at square leg. Neither wicketkeeper nor umpire repels a lens but it is Waugh’s angular precision that commands the attention. Everything is right; there is a beautiful Aussie obduracy about the stroke but also a quietness. England lost 25 out of the next 38 Ashes Tests in which Waugh played.The hardest thing of all to see is what is really there. Cricket often seems a game which is meant to be played rather than watched. We spend years of our lives watching it. And then a book like comes along, which justifies all that time and extends the parameters of our understanding.If is your thing, this book is probably not for you. If, on the other hand, you have looked at a game of cricket or even a group of players warming up and wondered, in both senses of the word, at the narratives such moments contain, one hopes your Christmas morning may be brightened by a stocking-filler richer than ripe Reblochon.And if you have a mild interest in cricket but know someone who is all but lost to the game, you should buy this book for them. Actually, buy two, because once you open , one doubts you’ll fancy parting with it. It helps us to see and then invites us to look again. In certain respects this is one of the bravest cricket books ever written.Feeling is the Thing That Happens in 1000th. of a Second – A Season of Cricket Photographer Patrick Eagar
By Christian Ryan
riverrun

'Afghanistan needs to organise international cricket at home'

Inzamam-ul-Haq talks about his short and successful stint as the team’s coach, and what they need to do to match the best sides in the world

Danyal Rasool16-May-2016Less than an hour before my interview with Inzamam-ul-Haq, I was watching him on television. He was conducting his first press conference in his new role as Pakistan’s chief selector after shortlisting 35 names for a training camp ahead of the side’s tour of England this summer, from which the final squad would be picked. Ahmed Shehzad and Umar Akmal, talented yet profligate batsmen, had been omitted. Inzamam didn’t seem too shy about laying down a marker.I’m sitting in Inzamam’s drawing room, and he enters dressed in a shalwar kameez and house slippers. Despite the short time between the press conference and our meeting, he shows no signs of being rushed; the feeling that he always had a little extra time clearly wasn’t confined to his batting.His tale of his stint as Afghanistan coach begins, rather improbably, in Saudi Arabia. “I was at the Hajj last year when Afghanistan called me,” he says. “Kabir Khan [former Afghanistan coach] approached me previously too, asking me to become Afghanistan’s coach, but I had declined. Afghanistan isn’t your average country in terms of the challenges you’re presented with. So when I received the call this time, I told them I’d take on the role, but only for the Zimbabwe tour [in October 2015]. I had no prior experience in coaching, so I wanted to see how I handled it before agreeing to any full-time contract. By the grace of Allah, we won both the ODI and T20 series. They offered me a three-year contract, but I didn’t want anything too long term, so I signed on for one year.”

“The Afghan boys don’t mind hitting the gym. They are also great foodies, and after all that hard work they’ll go in and polish off a whole barbecued lamb or two for dinner”

Inzamam’s six months as Afghanistan coach coincided with one of the most successful spells, statistically, in the country’s short cricketing history. They won 12 out of 17 T20Is, including all five against Zimbabwe and a stunning upset of eventual world champions West Indies at the World T20 this year. In ten ODIs during Inzamam’s stint, all against Zimbabwe, Afghanistan won six, winning series home and away. It was a stellar run, and, after putting it down to “good luck” in typically modest fashion, Inzamam reveals what he thinks were the two biggest factors behind the impressive numbers.”As soon as I became coach, we had a very busy run of fixtures coming up, so I focused on the things I thought would bring short-term success. I didn’t attempt to fix their techniques – you can’t do that overnight. I tried instead to change their approach to the game. For example, their satisfaction levels were very low. They were content to score 30-35 runs and get out, feeling they had done enough. I told them it was criminal to get out once they were set, had their eye in, and had begun to understand the pitch and conditions.”Secondly, cricket has become so much faster that the value of running singles, and the art of rotating the strike, has become a little lost. But I believe that any player capable of taking multiple singles per over will never feel too much pressure. I believe that was instrumental to our success.”The sense that coaching Afghanistan is no ordinary job looms large again as Inzamam talks about being forced to rely on second-hand knowledge regarding the state of cricket within the country. “I only spent one day in Afghanistan during my time as coach, and that was to sign my contract,” he says. “Obviously that meant I was dependent on their selectors and local coaches. Instead of hand-picking the boys who I thought could make the grade, I was sent players [to Afghanistan’s training base in Sharjah] who had performed well in domestic cricket in Afghanistan, but they did give me the final say regarding selection.””I tried to change their approach to the game. They were content to score 30-35 runs and get out, feeling they had done enough”•Getty ImagesHe stresses on the importance of a strong first-class system, directly linking it to international success, and praises Afghanistan for the strides they have made in this department. “They have organised formal ODI and T20 tournaments in the country. In addition, they’ve established approximately 40 cricket grounds across the country to give people the opportunity to play the game. They’ve invested in turf pitches. They’ve built a stadium in Jalalabad, and they recognise the value of a good first-class system.”And so they should. If these sorts of developments to safeguard their future weren’t taking place, all of their good work could be undone very quickly.” He emphasises the point with a warning: “Even Kenya played a World Cup semi-final once.”When the conversation moves to the possibility of Afghanistan attaining Test status in the next decade, he draws a comparison with a team he is rather more familiar with. “Look,” he says, with a hint of fatalism in his voice, “the reason Pakistan cricket is down in the dumps at present is the absence of virtually any international cricket here. And Pakistan has been an established Test side for over six decades. Afghanistan cricket is in its infancy. If they want to reach the levels that Test sides are expected to be at, they have to organise international cricket there. They to.”Maybe they could attract some of the up-and-comers in Associate circles to visit. But if they fail in that task, I simply don’t believe they can continue to progress like they’re capable.”It is imperative that Afghanistan cricket does well. You cannot imagine how passionate Afghanistan’s fans are, and how they live and die by every result.”I remember whenever we won a match, [Asghar] Stanikzai used to address the nation on television, pleading with them not to celebrate with gunfire, because on one occasion five people died during the festivities. Around the cricket world, we might not think too much of Asghar or Mohammad Nabi, but they are absolute megastars in Afghanistan. After we won in Zimbabwe, 15,000 people came to the airport to receive the team. They were taken directly to the stadium in Kabul, which was jam-packed, not to watch a cricket match but simply to give their heroes a homecoming.”

“It’s crucial that the ICC provides these Associate nations with quality coaches. A lot of the players I worked with have technical flaws and kinks in their batting that a good coach could easily have ironed out at Under-19 level”

One of the more charming features of Associate cricket is the level of camaraderie and togetherness among players from the various teams, and a recognition of the mutual challenges their fellow “second-class citizens” face. Given that every story requires a villain, many view the ICC as having filled that role with regard to the Associates, standing like a surly security guard outside a members-only party, refusing to let the intruders in, no matter how meticulously they appear to follow the dress code. Inzamam’s criticism of the ICC’s role, however, is far more tempered and nuanced.”I do think the ICC has financially helped Afghanistan and Ireland a lot, but I think it’s crucial that the ICC provides these Associate nations with quality coaches to work on their basics. A lot of the players I worked with have technical flaws and kinks in their batting that a good coach could easily have ironed out at Under-19 level, or in first-class cricket. But years of those shortcomings being left unchecked results in them being entrenched into the players’ batting techniques, and then they become extremely difficult to remedy, especially at international level, the level at which I have worked. If the ICC were to do that more frequently, I think it would make a huge difference to all Associate nations.”The topic of the players’ fitness requires tact and poise; it is Inzamam I’m talking to, after all. But a smile crosses his lips when I mention the word. “I remember before the 2003 World Cup, I worked extremely hard on my fitness,” he recalls. “A great deal of training and dietary discipline. I believe I lost 19kg. And 19 is the number of runs I scored in the entire tournament.”I only spent one day in Afghanistan during my time as coach, and that was to sign my contract”•Danyal RasoolNot that he means to discount the importance of fitness. “The Afghan boys are very hard-working, and they don’t mind hitting the gym,” he says. “They naturally have a strong, athletic build, which helps in a number of cricketing departments. But they are also great foodies, and after all that hard work they’ll go in and polish off a whole barbecued lamb or two for dinner. Next day, when the sun is out and you have to be fielding, the meat absorbs a lot of water in your body, making you extremely thirsty. So you have to be more professional if you want to take the next step in your progress.”Inzamam speaks of the players’ almost reverential respect for him, and their humility; these are young men who, in their country, are about as big a deal as Sachin Tendulkar is in India. He speaks about the country with great affection, and it is clear he desires to see the team succeed. His pride at their results under his tutelage speaks of his genuine satisfaction at being able to help a team and a nation he developed a great fondness for.All the more relevant to ask: when all seemed to be going swimmingly well, why did Inzamam leave Afghanistan cricket a few months ahead of time?The ensuing silence is longer than at any stage during the evening; he clearly didn’t take the decision, or his response, lightly. “I coached Afghanistan for seven months. Out of those, I spent five and a half away from home. After retiring from all forms of cricket in 2008, I took up no other assignments till this Afghanistan job. With young children, it was very difficult to spend all that time away from my family, and I didn’t want that to continue. So when the PCB approached me, I thought it was best to take up their offer, and Afghanistan were extremely understanding and generous. I still have a great relationship with the people I worked with.”Inzamam’s strongest conviction appeared to be his assertion that Afghanistan cricket cannot remain on the road to progress without international cricket being played in the country. And yet, he himself spent just a day in the country.For all his optimism, it is hard not to view Afghanistan’s cricket, and the scope for its development, in its geopolitical context. Many of the boys Inzamam interacted with became men before they picked up cricket equipment; indeed, long before boys should become men. This is a country whose scars aren’t symbolic, nor are they the remnants of mere sporting failure. They aren’t just any cricket team, they are an Associate nation; and not just any Associate nation, they are Afghanistan.Inzamam’s stint might have seemed all too short, but to those Afghans who live day to day, players and spectators alike, it will have lasted an eternity. What might they have achieved together if he had stayed the duration?

Superman, then Clark Kent

Plays of the Day from the Group A match between New Zealand and Bangladesh in Hamilton

Andrew McGlashan and Devashish Fuloria13-Mar-2015The fieldBrendon McCullum has been employing Test match fields throughout the tournament and today was no different. Two slips were a norm but at times, the number went up to four. However, it was not just about placing everyone for the edge. When Mahmudullah, the first right-hander in the line-up, walked in the third over, two short midwickets were in place. Mahmudullah knew what the ploy was, still he ended up pushing the inswinging Trent Boult delivery in the air towards those two men. Fortunately for him, he couldn’t have placed it better, the ball just out of reach of a diving Martin Guptill.The diveCould Brendon McCullum be Superman? He certainly did a good impression as he chased down a ball heading to the boundary, then flung himself with incredible hang-time to try and flick it back. As he thudded into the ground there were gasps; he pounded into the grass and was a little ginger as he got up. Every run is vital in a one-dayer, but some one-dayers are more vital than others. Next week’s in Wellington is more important than this match. Would it have been worth serious damage? And, in the end, it was still a boundary.The missGiven the high standards New Zealand set on the field, it was surprising to see them drop a few catches. Corey Anderson missed one at second slip, Guptill would have perhaps plucked on another day the one he missed at midwicket or the other one later in the innings had his anticipation been correct, but the one that stood out was McCulllum. As Shakib Al Hasan struck Corey Anderson flat and hard, the ball, as viewed from the press-box, right behind McCullum, seemed to be stuck on the bat for a moment before taking off. It was possibly the angle of the bat when it made contact. McCullum was confused too and reacted too late even though the ball wasn’t too far from his left shoulder. Injury averted, chance missed.The shotThere have been plenty of sixes at the World Cup, but not many off Daniel Vettori. When Mahmadullah, on 77, slog-swept over deep square-leg, it was just the third six Vettori had conceded in the tournament. Not that Vettori’s figures suffered too badly – although 42 was the most he had gone for in six matches – but Mahmadullah’s shot was another example of calculation and composure that has typified Bangladesh’s batting in the last two matches.The firstThe Bangladesh camp hinted strongly they would open the bowling with spin and they did not disappoint. Shakib, the stand-in captain, took the first over then Taijul Islam, brought into the side for fellow spinner Arafat Sunny, took the second. It made it the first time in ODI history that two left-arm spinners had opened the bowling.The failureKane Williamson has been under the weather in the days before this match and he’ll have felt pretty sick when he cut his second ball to point, giving Shakib his second wicket in four balls and leaving New Zealand 33 for 2. It ended a remarkable run of scoring in ODIs for him – this was the first innings since December 26, 2013 where he had not made double figures, during which time he has made 1360 runs at 64.76. But if he has saved a few for the quarter-final, the whole of New Zealand will be delighted.

Adventure almost vindicated for gambler Clarke

A few more runs on the board more quickly and a few more overs to bowl England out and Australia might almost have had a sniff of victory at The Oval

Brydon Coverdale at The Oval25-Aug-2013There are times when conservatism kicks in naturally. For Michael Clarke, that time arrived late on the final day at The Oval. Later than it would have for Ricky Ponting, or Alastair Cook, or MS Dhoni. It came gradually. Fielders had been stationed around the bat when Nathan Lyon was bowling, men in close on both sides, a slip and a leg slip. Slowly but surely, as the wickets didn’t come with the rush that he desired, Clarke moved his men back. And back. And back.By the time Shane Watson came on for his first over of the match, the fours were flowing, Kevin Pietersen was nearing fifty, and the last hour was approaching. Five men went back to the boundary. Then six. No slips. For the first time in a long time, captain Clarke was playing not to win but to draw. Such an approach is not his default setting. If it was, he would not have set England a gettable target, he would have told his men to bat for safety and then reassess.In Mohali in March, when India were chasing 133 in a minimum of 27 overs, Clarke pushed unsuccessfully for victory. He could have used delaying tactics, slowed his bowlers down, taken time over his fields. That he did not, that he moved the Australians through their overs quite normally led to a situation in which Australia actually bowled nine overs more than were required. It is just possible that they might otherwise have salvaged a draw.But there, a draw was of no value to Australia, for the series would stay alive only with an Australian win. At The Oval, there was no such series to play for. The urn was gone. Parity could not be achieved. But still there were reasons for Clarke to gamble. His men had not experienced a Test victory since the first week of the year. They had suffered seven losses and one draw in that time. If there was any possibility of giving the team the chance to win, it was worth taking.3-0, 4-0 does it make a difference? Not in any material sense. Clarke could have been the first Australian captain to lead his team to four defeats in an Ashes series without a win, but that is a manufactured statistic. Other Australian squads have lost Ashes contests 5-1 or 4-1. Others – as Clarke well knows – have lost three Ashes Tests by an innings at home. 3-0, 4-0, this was never going to plumb those depths.And so it was no surprise that Clarke tried to manufacture a result, tried to force a match that looked like petering out to a draw into a new direction. He sent Watson out to open with David Warner, installed James Faulkner and Brad Haddin as pinch-hitters, and gave Ryan Harris and Mitchell Starc licence to attack. Not all of those moves paid off. With hindsight, perhaps Chris Rogers might have picked the gaps in the field more effectively than others who tried to clear it.A few more runs on the board more quickly and a few more overs to bowl England out and Australia might almost have had a sniff. By giving England the lure of a 4-0 victory, they enticed enough shots to claim five England wickets. It is difficult to imagine most captains in Clarke’s situation allowing the opposition such a chance. Dismissing a team in one session is a remarkable goal but that Australia attempted it in search of that elusive win was in many ways admirable.It was also symptomatic of Australia’s wider approach. Day in, day out, their Test batsmen play at balls they should leave, lack patience, and try to force things. And when that risk-taking behaviour fails, they are inclined to go for double or nothing, chase good money with bad, as gamblers call it. The pay-offs can be great but the losses crippling.England and South Africa are not the world’s best teams by accident. Often they play for safety first, victory second. England certainly did on a dour day three at The Oval. Clarke often talks about consistency; his men will become a better side if they can adopt a little of that mentality in their general approach to Test cricket. On a day like this, such an approach was of little value to Australia. Clarke’s gamble was necessary at The Oval.”That’s the way I’d like to see cricket played,” Clarke said after the near-loss. “I’d certainly like to lead the Australian team playing in that type of manner. I think we had nothing to lose, obviously 3-0 down. And to me, even if you’re not 3-0 down you’ve got to try to do everything you can to win the Test match. There’s obviously the risk of losing and that was there today as well, but I think it was what we had to try and do.”One team is going to win and one team is going to lose. That’s the way I’ve always played my cricket. I try to win every game. Today there was a risk we might lose but I’m not scared of that risk.”At least, not until Pietersen gets going. Then, even Clarke finds within himself an ounce of conservatism.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus